Template parameters not used in partial specialization
By : user3202527
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
This might help you You shouldn't need a specialization at all here: iterator_traits is already specialized for pointer types and if you do end up with an iterator that is a class type, you can just define those required typedefs in the iterator class. The problem is that in order to match the primary specialization, the compiler needs to take the arguments with which the template is used, plug them into the specialization, and see whether they match. code :
template <typename T> struct S { typedef int type; };
template <typename T>
struct Traits { };
template <typename T>
struct Traits<typename S<T>::type> { };
|
Partial template specialization of a function for a type which needs additional template parameters
By : TryAgain
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Does that help When I have functions, I prefer to stay with functions (which is more beneficial with member functions, because you still have access to *this). code :
template<typename T, unsigned n>
unsigned count_components_switch(boost::mpl::identity<A<T, n>>)
{
return n;
}
template<typename T>
unsigned count_components_switch(boost::mpl::identity<T>)
{
return 1;
}
template<typename T>
unsigned count_components()
{
return (count_components_switch)(boost::mpl::identity<T>());
}
|
Partial specialization of template template parameters, with varying number of parameters
By : doosami
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish of those help If the title doesn't make sense, here's the gist of the problem: , In C++11 you can use variadics: code :
template <template<typename T, typename...> class ContainerOf>
class Foo;
|
c++11 -Template MetaProgramming - Error: template parameters not used in partial specialization
By : Maithili
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
|
Define partial specialization for some external template classes with restriction for template parameters
By : fath
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
this one helps. If you're OK with using proposed but not yet standardized language features, this seems to work under gcc 6.1 with the -fconcepts flag: code :
template <typename Base, typename Derived>
concept bool BaseOf = std::is_base_of<Base, Derived>::value;
namespace std {
template <template<typename,std::size_t> class Tmpl, typename T, std::size_t N>
requires BaseOf<Foo<T, N>, Tmpl<T, N>>
class tuple_size<Tmpl<T, N>>
: public std::integral_constant<std::size_t, N>
{ };
};
// tests
static_assert(std::tuple_size<FooDerived<int, 5>>::value == 5,
"FooDerived");
static_assert(std::tuple_size<std::array<int, 5>>::value == 5,
"std::array");
template <typename T>
concept bool SizedTuple = requires {
{ std::tuple_size<T>::value } -> std::size_t
};
static_assert(!SizedTuple<BarDerived<int, 5>>, "BarDerived");
|